|
Reasons for using the passive voice
In the first test, the APC shell was fired
from 100 metres at an RHA target.
Someone is doing the firing here, but it is not important to the writer/researcher's
purposes to identify the actor.
Creating a passive sentence here rightfully puts the emphasis on General
Daillaire's brush with death at a roadside ambush and away from the
perpetrators, who are less important to the point of the sentence.
A box of hand grenades was stolen from the
supply depot last night.
Many decisions were made concerning the NATO
targets.
The use of the passive here avoids assigning responsibility for the
decisions. Writing like this is always suspect; it gives the impression
that the writer has something to hide. A direct, active sentence makes
the point clear and satisfies the reader:
The Commander-in-Chief made the crucial decisions
concerning the
NATO targets.
If you make a mistake like this again, you
will have to face the consequences. (active sentence)
A mistake like this must not happen again
or there will be consequences. (passive sentence)
Use of the passive here is less abrasive, less affronting to the individual
addressed. For reasons of politeness and civility the passive voice
may be preferred.
I conducted the operation with the full approval
of NDHQ.
(active)
The operation was conducted with the full
approval of NDHQ.
(passive)
Writers sometimes formulate a sentence in the passive voice for the sake
of sentence variety, but this strategy should be used sparingly. And that,
apart from a prescriptive use of the passive in scientific writing, is
the best advice. |